But there is nothing mysterious about the dirac delta function. It seems to me that to claim that it is deep and subtle is just a cover up. After all the time you spent with him and in study of his paper, why can't you explain how a delta function set to zero can become non-zero later on.

Regards,

Richard

• The explanation, Yanniru.... - dolphin - July 23, 2002 - 04:31 UTC
  • That's not mathematics - yanniru - July 23, 2002 - 15:08 UTC
    • Traffic jams were analogies - dolphin - July 28, 2002 - 01:09 UTC
• It doesn't happen!!! - doctordick - July 24, 2002 - 13:55 UTC
  • Will you agree that FP cannot be infinite - yanniru - July 24, 2002 - 16:55 UTC
    • Of course (nt)! - doctordick - July 24, 2002 - 17:23 UTC
      • Then FP cannot contain non-zero delta functions - yanniru - July 24, 2002 - 21:08 UTC
        • Again, you are a complete idiot!! - doctordick - July 25, 2002 - 00:20 UTC
          • Trying to understand - yanniru - July 25, 2002 - 14:14 UTC
            • Have you had any math at all? - doctordick - July 25, 2002 - 14:27 UTC
              • If so, then you derive the algorithm for Psi from the region of - yanniru - July 25, 2002 - 20:29 UTC
                • invalid data - yanniru - July 25, 2002 - 20:30 UTC
              • Summary for the holophysicist - yanniru - July 26, 2002 - 01:02 UTC
                • Maybe its a matter of perspective - dolphin - July 28, 2002 - 01:30 UTC
                  • He discovered that the laws of physics - yanniru - July 28, 2002 - 12:57 UTC
                    • Invalid data? - dolphin - July 29, 2002 - 02:54 UTC
                      • Physics is constrained by experiments - yanniru - July 29, 2002 - 14:21 UTC
                        • The laws of definition - dolphin - August 3, 2002 - 15:24 UTC
                • Think just a little once! - doctordick - July 29, 2002 - 14:46 UTC
                  • Trouble with your semantics - yanniru - July 29, 2002 - 20:51 UTC