Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Great Position Paper Up To Here

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on July 22, 2002 13:44:30 UTC

***I think the reason these three didn't study the paper in depth, was because of my reason number 4. It was just too threatening to open their minds enough to try to understand what Dick has done. (***

It's Dick's personal remarks about us that is threatening, not his paper. I like everything he did except for his use of the delta function. So I cannot understand why either he or now you cannot explain why something so straightforward as the substitution of the delta function set to zero into other equations does not remain zero.

Instead of trying to explain, he resorts to attack; and in the above quote, you verge on the same.

Besides, Dick's results have to be correct for parts of them have already been published in another paper.

Regards,

Richard

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins