"you should be cloned ten billion times
so your combined IQ will add up to mine."

An insult on my intelligence is quite disgusting. I was simply trying to be a nice guy and see how your dermatology appointments were going and you blast me with your vindictive attiturde. Obviously it should be said that hell hath no fury like Mike Pearson's scorn. You sir are most certainly an intellect and one of the "top minds" Harv likes to comment about, you worked as part of a politicians campaign. Everyone knows how hard it is to catch the attention of the common man with trite slogans and cliche filled speeches.

BTW, how are those "regular" appointments to the massage parlor going. You told me you only had a stiff neck, so I didn't think it would take 20 visits over a 3 week time span. I hope all your other muscles are getting proper treatment.

Bye bye - Scott

• My definition of top minds - harvey1 - April 29, 2002 - 18:36 UTC
  • A dilemma for you, Harv - aurino - April 29, 2002 - 18:52 UTC
    • Top minds are research-specific - harvey1 - April 29, 2002 - 19:08 UTC
      • You evaded my question - aurino - April 29, 2002 - 19:19 UTC
        • Which question? - harvey1 - April 29, 2002 - 19:33 UTC
      • Brilliant, Mike....or do I mean, "Harv"? - carefuluniverse - April 29, 2002 - 19:42 UTC
        • Uugghh! - harvey1 - April 29, 2002 - 20:38 UTC
          • Nice reply....something original ! - carefuluniverse - April 29, 2002 - 21:44 UTC
      • "Top Minds"? - natims - May 1, 2002 - 02:05 UTC
        • Yeah, here's a clue: think "top" and "bottom" - carefuluniverse - May 1, 2002 - 02:09 UTC
        • Okay, a definition - harvey1 - May 1, 2002 - 14:17 UTC
          • Returning the favor - carefuluniverse - May 1, 2002 - 17:15 UTC
  • actually, an example cannot be a definition - carefuluniverse - April 29, 2002 - 19:45 UTC
    • Here's a definition - aurino - April 29, 2002 - 19:57 UTC
      • No respect, huh? - harvey1 - April 29, 2002 - 20:49 UTC
        • You typify your complaint very nicely ! - carefuluniverse - April 29, 2002 - 21:46 UTC
          • No I don't - harvey1 - April 30, 2002 - 15:22 UTC
            • You pose a subjective problem and ask for an objective answer - carefuluniverse - April 30, 2002 - 18:16 UTC
              • No, the bell does not ring for cookies...just an expression - carefuluniverse - April 30, 2002 - 18:17 UTC
                • All opinions are more or less equal - yanniru - April 30, 2002 - 20:11 UTC
                  • Now you're talking bells and apples - carefuluniverse - April 30, 2002 - 21:29 UTC
        • True, but... - stormcrow - April 30, 2002 - 03:22 UTC
          • I agree - harvey1 - April 30, 2002 - 14:36 UTC
        • No Harv, you're wrong - aurino - April 30, 2002 - 12:45 UTC
          • Disappointing post - harvey1 - April 30, 2002 - 14:31 UTC
            • Ramblings in a world gone wild - darwinpoodle - April 30, 2002 - 15:20 UTC
              • That was funny! - aurino - April 30, 2002 - 15:40 UTC
            • That doesn't bother me - aurino - April 30, 2002 - 15:30 UTC
              • How could it possibly anyway? - harvey1 - April 30, 2002 - 15:54 UTC
                • That's right, you don't exist - aurino - April 30, 2002 - 16:49 UTC
                  • I'm baaacccckkkkk... - harvey1 - April 30, 2002 - 18:09 UTC
      • Yes, that is a definition...can't quibble there - carefuluniverse - April 29, 2002 - 21:54 UTC
  • actually, an example cannot be a definition - carefuluniverse - April 29, 2002 - 19:45 UTC