And is not brain chemistry (as any chemistry) governed by quantum mechanics of interacting charges (electrons, ions, atoms, molecules)?

What else is there?

And if QM is mechanics of waves (therefore "wavy" electrons and atoms should obey the uncertainty principle), then why can't brain be to some degree uncertain too? (Still in full agreement with math).

Therefore why can't brain be illogical, or lie, or act suicidally, etc. (Although, as to lie, usually people lie due to perfectly logic reasons - self preservation, thus a lie is not nesesserely a product of uncertainty principle).

• Heisenberg - stormcrow - September 19, 2001 - 03:14 UTC
  • Heisenberg uncertanty principle (to Mario and others). - alexander - September 20, 2001 - 15:06 UTC
    • Uncertainty then just common sense? - dolphin - September 21, 2001 - 00:35 UTC
    • Perceptions are just perceptions - luis_hamburgh - September 21, 2001 - 01:14 UTC
      • Mario already answered it - dolphin - September 21, 2001 - 04:22 UTC
        • To Luis. "Perception" exists in religion, not in science. - alexander - September 21, 2001 - 17:12 UTC
          • Feelings? - luis_hamburgh - September 21, 2001 - 20:42 UTC
            • Most of knowledge science have, did NOT come from our senses. - alexander - September 21, 2001 - 23:41 UTC
              • I understand your point - stormcrow - September 22, 2001 - 00:24 UTC
                • Nope. How can balance show different numbers for differ. people? - alexander - September 24, 2001 - 21:33 UTC
              • Objectivity comes from Existence - dolphin - September 22, 2001 - 06:33 UTC
          • Is this like the tree falling in the forest thingy... - rggarfinkle - September 22, 2001 - 15:38 UTC
    • What should I do Alex? - aurino - September 21, 2001 - 11:52 UTC
      • Use music to understand it! - dolphin - September 21, 2001 - 14:03 UTC
        • I use music to understand a lot of things - aurino - September 21, 2001 - 15:39 UTC
          • Let's use acoustic as an example of wave packet. - alexander - September 21, 2001 - 20:01 UTC
            • Appreciate that explanation (nt) - dolphin - September 21, 2001 - 22:02 UTC
            • I didn't ask you to explain physics - aurino - September 25, 2001 - 15:23 UTC
              • Yikes! - stormcrow - September 25, 2001 - 16:58 UTC
                • I just hate to be misunderstood - aurino - September 25, 2001 - 20:31 UTC
                  • Well, if you don't understand physics, you still have choices. - alexander - September 25, 2001 - 23:20 UTC
                    • Math can be child's play - dolphin - September 26, 2001 - 01:42 UTC
                    • Not the point again, Alex - aurino - September 26, 2001 - 12:34 UTC
      • It's not easy - stormcrow - September 21, 2001 - 17:30 UTC
• For the birds... - rggarfinkle - September 19, 2001 - 04:46 UTC
• Uncertainty applies only statistically - dolphin - September 19, 2001 - 13:14 UTC
• Illogical decisions - jisbond - September 19, 2001 - 14:52 UTC
  • Science understands religion - luis_hamburgh - September 19, 2001 - 22:47 UTC
    • Perhaps there is only one science that understands all sciences - jisbond - September 19, 2001 - 23:11 UTC
      • Emotionalism is not illogical - luis_hamburgh - September 19, 2001 - 23:24 UTC
        • a good example..... - jisbond - September 19, 2001 - 23:32 UTC
          • Jisbond, you are totally missing the point - stormcrow - September 20, 2001 - 03:20 UTC
            • I agree... - rggarfinkle - September 20, 2001 - 04:47 UTC
              • The Illogical Spock - jisbond - September 20, 2001 - 05:21 UTC
                • You broke the Fundamental Law of Reality - stormcrow - September 20, 2001 - 15:38 UTC
                  • Ha. - jisbond - September 20, 2001 - 21:25 UTC
                  • Hilarious! (n/t) - luis_hamburgh - September 21, 2001 - 01:15 UTC
              • The Destiny of Logic - jisbond - September 20, 2001 - 05:35 UTC
            • what I am pointing to is that Illogic dose exist - jisbond - September 20, 2001 - 05:52 UTC
            • Another saying by Nisami - jisbond - September 20, 2001 - 14:28 UTC
        • no compromise in Logic - jisbond - September 19, 2001 - 23:35 UTC
          • True - rggarfinkle - September 20, 2001 - 00:15 UTC
        • lifestyle of Illogic - jisbond - September 19, 2001 - 23:41 UTC
          • Long hard lessons... - rggarfinkle - September 20, 2001 - 03:51 UTC
            • in to time line of Logic - jisbond - September 20, 2001 - 06:02 UTC
        • juncture of true faith - jisbond - September 20, 2001 - 14:35 UTC
    • Hi, Luis - stormcrow - September 19, 2001 - 23:17 UTC
• Echoing Stormcrow - luis_hamburgh - September 19, 2001 - 22:31 UTC
  • Uncertainty doesn't apply to 1 particle - dolphin - September 19, 2001 - 23:34 UTC
    • Why can't uncertanty apply to one particle? - alexander - September 20, 2001 - 19:41 UTC
      • What did Heinz Pagels mean? - dolphin - September 21, 2001 - 01:00 UTC
• Echoing Stormcrow - luis_hamburgh - September 19, 2001 - 22:48 UTC
  • ? - luis_hamburgh - September 19, 2001 - 22:49 UTC
  • Answering Luis. - alexander - September 20, 2001 - 19:48 UTC
    • I answered above. - luis_hamburgh - September 21, 2001 - 01:16 UTC
• Kinetics or lemmings? You choose. - rggarfinkle - September 20, 2001 - 04:59 UTC