Back to Home

General Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Misc. Topics | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
That's Science,not Semantics

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Gfjhgvfgb on July 9, 2004 18:54:01 UTC

I'm a scientist,that's mean that I OBSERVE nature and draw conclusions from what I see.And I see space.THAT'S THE OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE.
Now,we observe that space have some properties,but there is not an explanation of these properties and the 5 laws are designed for that-to provide explanation.
That's matter of SCIENCE,not of LANGUAGE.So,please use SCIENCE,not semantic or linguistic or whatever language stupidity you can think of.LANGUAGE IS IRRELEVANT TO PHYSICS.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins