Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Polite Rebutal

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Gary Conner on May 3, 2004 06:53:26 UTC

thanks for sparing me the effort of debunking 'master lee'. what a crock of pseudo-science that was. real scientists use disprovable means [ie: mathematics] to advance their claims, not self-aggrandizing and untestable conjectures.

i had additional objections to yours, but, you covered more than enough to make the point.

[btw, what is the current state of opinion on the cahill concepts?]

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins