Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Consequences
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Gary Conner on May 6, 2004 07:34:54 UTC |
thanks for the reply. clearly you are well versed. let me gripe about dark matter. the observable mass of our own galaxy, and virtually all others, is not nearly enough to explain galactic rotation. that is disturbing. ordinary 'clumps' of atomic hydrogen gravitationally collapses into stars, which have observable consequences. why are there not dark matter equivalents that are observable? |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |