Blackholes2 Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Missing Mass
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Gary Conner on May 8, 2004 08:52:22 UTC |
thanks wanda. give link. never too old to learn. torn between the two schools. i have a hard time with dark matter. is just too convenient. i also have a hard time with symmetry. it is too pretty. i like lorentzian relativity.. even thought it creates more problems than it solves. but general relativity makes predictions that just do not not fit with quantum theory. one or the other must be fatally flawed. that bothers me. i think cahill is a bunch of bunk... his concepts of self referential organization infer a much faster rate of stellar evolution than what is observed. |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |