Back to Home

Blackholes2 Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes II | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: How Good Is GR?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Herb S. on March 24, 2000 05:15:14 UTC

I don`t know of any theory which has been as successful as GR in predicting such things as starlight bending. As far as I know, GR has met every test successfully. The only area of controversy that I know of is in what happens in black holes, where it is necessary to marry GR with quantum mechanics - it doesn`t work!
A while ago, there were other variations of GR that were proposed, but they seemed to have been discarded. The main open question has to do with the "cosmological constant", which Einstein originally proposed to avoid the expanding universe, and thought it was a mistake. However, current observations about the universe expansion rate seem to show a need for one.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins