That is, only waves exist. Particles are names of processes, the processes that happen when waves interact with matter. The interaction is quantized- descrete. But there is no evidence that any of the entities are descrete. In fact, at least where photons are concerned the evidence from double slit experiments is that waves exist, not photons. I'll explain if you are interested.

Richard

• excepting for the classical sense - sagefr0g - November 15, 2004 - 03:39 UTC
  • Classical theory of particles - yanniru - November 15, 2004 - 13:06 UTC
    • Another coincidence - yanniru - November 15, 2004 - 13:31 UTC
      • ...or i-i-is it? - carefuluniverse - November 17, 2004 - 04:20 UTC
        • Ruquist is right - wandaqueen - January 22, 2005 - 03:33 UTC
          • Ruquist very well might BE anonymous Wandaqueen - kantolfir2 - January 22, 2005 - 20:31 UTC
            • Mike is just illiterate about science - wandaqueen - January 23, 2005 - 04:04 UTC
              • Devise a proof which will satisfy an unfair, anonymous person - kantolfir2 - January 23, 2005 - 04:28 UTC
                • That's no proof - wandaqueen - January 23, 2005 - 14:08 UTC
                  • The alleged question was not asked coherently - carefuluniverse - January 23, 2005 - 23:06 UTC
                    • What is the matter? - wandaqueen - January 24, 2005 - 02:51 UTC
                      • Anonymous Wandaqueen requested proof then dropped the ball - kantolfir2 - January 27, 2005 - 18:51 UTC
                        • My preference - wandaqueen - January 27, 2005 - 19:27 UTC
      • Why not find out for sure? - duordi - November 24, 2004 - 03:18 UTC
        • Sure it has.... - bruce - November 24, 2004 - 20:50 UTC
          • Bruce is right. - duordi - November 25, 2004 - 15:13 UTC
    • There is no evidence in the double... - bruce - November 15, 2004 - 20:11 UTC
• QED - bruce - November 15, 2004 - 04:18 UTC