Anonymous Wandaqueen Requested Proof Then Dropped The Ball - an Astronomy Net Blackholes Forum Message

Blackholes Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Blackholes I \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Anonymous Wandaqueen Requested Proof Then Dropped The Ball

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on January 27, 2005 18:51:00 UTC

Anonymous Wandaqueen asked for proof that Mike is not scientifically illiterate. Mike replied
by asking for a standard of proof. in order to
comply with Anonymous Wandaqueen's request.

Anonymous Wandaqueen then wrote:
What is the matter? Got no intelligence. Got no credentials. Got no education. Just plain stupid. That's poor Mike.

Really? Is that the standard of proof that
satisfies Anonymous Wandaqueen?

Follow Ups:

My preference - wandaqueen - January 27, 2005 - 19:27 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins