Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Ruquist Very Well Might BE Anonymous Wandaqueen

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on January 22, 2005 20:31:47 UTC

It is difficult sometimes to converse plitiely with anonymous, irrepsonsible Wandaqueen
because for a great number of its posts, a proper response would contain strong pejorative
language. In answer to Wandaqueen's supposed question: No. Its guess is highly inaccurate,
and appears more like a pretense of being new to the forum than actually being an intelligently conceived question.

Anonymous W. wrote:

"You are just quibbling with words. As far as I can tell that is all you ever do. All you have displayed is that you do not know any fundamental physics. Are you an English major dabbling in physics?"

A reaonable guess is that anonymous W.'s methodology for arriving at that conclusion and guess (about my science logic and background) might be typical of how coherent is anonymous W.'s application of the supposedly cautious, systematic approach to questions which we call "science."

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins