Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Thought Ray Was Saying His Ideas Are Compatible

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on November 10, 2002 04:49:22 UTC

You raise the bar on the ideas of others
but are very charitable toward your own.

Nick wrote:
"Oh, Ray, you can't read a result and then claim your theory predicts it. You have to make the prediction BEFORE the result. Either that or you need to show that the mathematics fit your theory. I promise I will give your theory some respect if you can do this."


I thought Ray was saying his ideas are compatible
with the latest findings. I don't see why anyone should let Nick appoint himself the arbiter of what Ray's theory has to do. Nick obviously ignored my post about science's triple role:
"explain, control, predict."
I am going to call Nick "Mr. No-Learn Rhetoric."

Nick, you don't meet your own standards
for "respect" with the ideas on your web site or your posts on various subjects on astronomy.net. Should we give your
ideas respect?


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins