Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Ruquist Writes:"So Ray You See That It's All Been Worked Out..."

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on November 10, 2002 18:00:31 UTC

Nick and Ruquist were faulting
Raymond Redbourne's big page of
physics ideas for what they alleged
was lack of scientific rigor.
Today, Redbourne responded by predicting
several testable phenomena.

Ruquist, in a style with which I have
become well acquainted (and I served as editor
for numerous writers while in the U.S.Air Force) did not respond to those points directly
but pooh-poohed it all.
He should respond to Ray's prediction about happens to hydrogen and helium going into and
coming out of black holes...etc.

Ruquist instead wrote: "Gravitational-mass / Inertial-mass Equivalence comes from Lorentz invariance. Hoyle and Naraliker have already proven mathematically that matter creation and/or destruction can occur in regions of non-Lorentz invariance, such as the singularity of a black hole. So Ray you see that it's all been worked out doing math physics."

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins