One must construct a conceptual AND mathematical explanation for the following phenomena:

-Precession of mercury
-gravitational lensing (verified mathematically with sun)
-orbital decay of neutron star binaries (exact equation)
-the very existence of neutron stars
-pulsars
-presence of muons in lower atmosphere (they have short decay times)
-Chandrasekhar limit
-superluminal motion in jets
-particle accelerators
-difference in time rates at different heights on earth
-cosmological redshift
-MM experiment
-atomic bombs
-fusion bombs
-everything else in nuclear physics

I'm sure there are many more, but those are the first that come to mind. You can't convince anybody with imprecise language and made-up words. You have to have solid mathematical proof if you're going to get anybody to believe you. Your "I'm not constrained by mathematics" shpiel sounds like a sort of religious claim to higher knowledge. The fact is, even if you think you're beyond mathematics, you have to use it to refute the existing evidence.

To my knowledge, there are no major unsolved paradoxes in relativity. Many of the ones that came up with special relativity (like the Twin paradox) were easily explained with general relativity. Other ones were simply misinterpretations. Einstein did complain about the production of singularities in black holes, but black holes are not causally connected to the rest of the universe, so it may not matter whether relativity is valid inside of them. I don't know if you intend to refute quantum mechanics as well, but I could give you another list for that, if you like.

• Excellent list. - rayredbourne - November 5, 2002 - 13:02 UTC
  • Ray... - cosmotiger - November 5, 2002 - 21:18 UTC
    • How many posts by Nick Bond were stated mathmatically? - carefuluniverse - November 6, 2002 - 01:40 UTC
• Here's what I'm in the process of doing - rayredbourne - November 5, 2002 - 13:13 UTC
• black holes are not causally connected to the rest of the univer - yaniru - November 5, 2002 - 17:51 UTC
  • Let me amend that... - cosmotiger - November 5, 2002 - 20:37 UTC
• To disprove GR - cindy - November 10, 2002 - 16:15 UTC
  • And in order to do that... - cosmotiger - November 10, 2002 - 22:28 UTC
  • Cindy- What is your thought - yaniru - November 11, 2002 - 03:59 UTC
• I love when persons ask good coherent questions like this - carefuluniverse - November 10, 2002 - 18:17 UTC