Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
How Many Posts By Nick Bond Were Stated Mathmatically?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on November 6, 2002 01:40:50 UTC


Nick wrote:
"Call it virtual, real, fuzzy, evanescent, whatever, math describes our world with high precision. Your vague ramblings do not."


Nick has made numerous statements without
supporting them mathematically in
59 posts so far.
I agree with the need for good math. I do not
agree that Ray is rambling any more vaguely than
any other person here discussing physics, theology, history, philosophy...
and less vaguely than most.
Nick has declined to support his statements scientifically when I asked. There is no such thing as a privilege here. A double standard in science is the same as bombast and needs watching.
I DO support the need for math in our assertions. I have used good math and good facts to form my statements, and they have
not been effectively refuted...including by Nick.
No illwill, Nick.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins