Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on September 24, 2001 03:16:26 UTC

Hello Mark,

I think you have chosen a very fitting screen name for yourself.

I understand what a vector is, insofar as it describes the 'from point a to point b' process as a whole (in the case of a linear vector). I understand that a vector is non-specific in its spatial manifestation; that is, I understand that a vector's location is no more a *per se* part of the vector itself than a plank of wood's location is a part of the plank itself (although this presumption could open an interesting philosophical thread).

But what I can't see, and need you to help me see, is how we can determine the momentum of a specific object without knowing the object's trajectory, and thereby the location of its vector.



Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins