Back to Home

Blackholes Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Blackholes I | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Let's Break This Down Exactly...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on September 11, 2001 00:23:53 UTC

Alex,

Just to be clear, I'd like to cite your premise, deductions, and conclusions in a clear format:

(1) Something material exists for no reason which we will call 'stuff'

(2) This 'stuff' has natural properties not determined by logic/math.

(3) This 'stuff' is representable by symbolic notation (e.g., 1='stuff' 0=no 'stuff')

(4) This symbolic representation is enough to account for the body of logic and then mathematics.

(5) As a representation this body of logic and mathematics restrict the properties of (2)



>>>If Anything Exists, It Obeys Math By Definition.>Because math is nothing more than labeling existense=1, non existense =0. By doing so, we SET binary logical rules (either 1 or 0, but not both).>>If nothing exists, there is nothing to assign 0/1 to (nothing to count yet).>So, math does not apply to NONEXISTING objects or worlds (well, actually you still can call them "0" and thus make math valid for them too).

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins