Quite often i have read that relativity and quantum mechanics are inconsistent with each other at certain points.......
eg the EPR experiment and the proof that a pair quantum particles do show a bizarre behaviour and some sort of signal(which travels a t infinite speed ) is transferred from one to the other which tells it to determine its state which was not "determined" before since the observation was not made...........,
Events later in the century on the "God does play dice or not .......thing etc etc.
If again and again we confront that quantum mechanics despite being inconsistent with realtivity is the most mysterious yet the most successful of all the present theories
The question is :
How much we believe in relativity....????
or
Am i interpreting the data available in books in a wrong way ?????
iamnotagenius

• Signal.. - bruce - May 23, 2001 - 19:21 UTC
  • Is quantum theory really about point particles? - yanniru - May 24, 2001 - 12:33 UTC
    • The Standard Model of Particle Physics.. - bruce - May 24, 2001 - 19:39 UTC
      • Well, that is not correct. Strings are not the only game in town - alexander - May 25, 2001 - 03:23 UTC
        • Strings.. - bruce - May 25, 2001 - 08:06 UTC
          • Can that wave approach be extended to detection theory - yanniru - May 25, 2001 - 11:25 UTC
    • waves and particles - richardlewis - June 5, 2001 - 08:38 UTC
      • Theory inconsistent with itself - yanniru - June 5, 2001 - 12:46 UTC