You make far greater premptions on your own than those who believe in UFOs being "others", and these presumptions are apparently made having done no "foot work" nor investigations, just looking at superficial "sightings" reports and arriving at superficial beliefs as if they were "reasonable" and dictated. THis amounts to the philosophy that "All you know is all there is that exists"... Period.
Reference my previosu post: "NASA Provides Stunning Proofs of 'UFOs' "
Your presumptions are that we must be alone. Statistically this is not likely. Your inherent presumption is we may be superior to others if they exist, though you do not say this outright. You presume these others would have "a reason" to make thmeselves known to us, ignoring what may well be a far greater reason they might have to remain UNKNOWN to us.
And you presume that our history of "UFOS" and interaction with "others" is solely a recent one. I submit to you that it is not only a recent interaction and goes back to Biblical times and before and may indeed involve our own creation.
I can tell you for a *FACT* that there are others and they are known by some to exist: Not hypothesized. Not speculated. But KNOWN for a fact to exist.
I can tell you for a *FACT* that these others are "covered up" by some who know they exist. I have met with a few if these "some" who know without question that others beyond ourselves do exist, two of these being very highly placed persons in NASA Washington D.C. Headquarters.
If you need a "rationale" for these "persons" are hiding the presence of other "beings", I suggest you consult the "Brookings Report" written in 1959 for NASA itself as a method of operation preceeding our entry into space. These other beings have been witnessed and spoken of by Astronauts Conrad, Aldrin, Mitchell & Cooper among others. These etra-terrastrial intereactions and presences have been documented in our own orbit and on Mars.
Learnard, Stop pontificating on things you know nothing about. You are only protecting your fragile personal paradigms and doing so with a total disregard for any sort of reasonable inquiry into to those facts and evidences most assuredly even at your own disposal.
"It seems to me" .... that you are only lazy and lacking personal initiave.. but then this probably serves the protection of those fragile paradigms.