Back to Home

UFO Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | UFO Discussion and Tracking | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: PLUTO NOT THERE!

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bill Beastem on June 22, 1999 18:29:37 UTC

: : This recent news blurb just appeared in Astronomy America. Why havenít I seen this on the nightly news?

: : PLUTO NOT THERE! : : Material submitted by Iman Joyce and Dick Warner

: : Recent NASA findings regarding the non-existence of the Planet Pluto have sent shock waves throughout the international scientific community. Many astronomers are calling the recent data, made by the Hubble Space Telescope, as "shattering".

: : NASA announced their "un-discovery" at a press conference June 3rd at the Global Orbiting Telemetry Conference on Helisopheric Arcs. "Pluto does not exist," began a stone faced Dr. Erwin Hubert. "What does exist are a series of asteroids, perhaps several thousand, that lie in a tight orbit beyond, and intersecting with, Neptuneís, which for years have been mistaken for a ninth planet." This astounding information solves on the greatest planetary mysteries about Pluto Ė itís size. "For decades now," Dr. Hubert continued, "astronomers have disagreed on the size of Pluto, and now we know...that they have been looking at different sized asteroids."

: : Mr. Gerald Fitzsimons of the Copernicum Society, a watchdog organization dedicated to the responsible distribution and advancement of science, called the announcement "Long overdue. I mean, honestly, have you ever seen Pluto? Has anyone ever seen Pluto? The answer is no. Why, then, have we for decades believed it to exist? Because scientists told us it was there. Because their calculations about the wobble in Neptuneís orbit needed to be reconciled. They never considered several thousand asteroids. A ninth planet was much too romantic an idea to resist."

: : where did u get this info from??

:I read that same article. I have always thought Pluto was just a fantasy. I wonder why no more information is available about this. Is somebody trying to keep this info underwraps?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2017 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins