Revised: Question About Reason - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Revised: Question About Reason

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mohammad Isa Mirsiam on August 11, 2001 02:49:00 UTC

Can reason mean for? Like for some one? Or because of a caused being that is caused for the reason?

I am inclined to believe that reason or the reason alone may be responsible for everything else coming in to being. I also believe that the causer who is not caused and lives eternally embedded reason in to an empty set and the reason (by or in extension) was so powerful that it generated the force large enough to cause the reason become manifest as the only method of self fulfillment mad manifest as matter and antimatter.

With My Best Regards

jisbond

Follow Ups:

An answer from one of your references - yanniru - August 12, 2001 - 20:53 UTC
- pass no judgement upon others, for all are guilty of this too - jisbond - August 13, 2001 - 03:27 UTC
  - You should read what you recommend us to read - yanniru - August 13, 2001 - 12:51 UTC
    - No wine for the ckoking man - yanniru - August 13, 2001 - 16:47 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins