Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Still (still) Think You Are Being Anti-realist

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on July 30, 2001 23:50:12 UTC

Hi Dick,

Let me respond to your post:

>>>The difference between my position and the positions specified above is simply that I express "reality" as an unknown and then attempt to use logic to discover what it is! That is, a rational attack on the problem of examining reality itself (as opposed to what I call the "by guess and by golly" attack currently in vogue).>>My model is specifically, "reality is a set of numbers". Would you prefer "reality is a set of pligits" (which we are aware of and have no properties beyond the those found in the set of real numbers). That is no more than a name change.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins