I Like That - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I Like That

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on July 8, 2001 02:13:56 UTC

"So if the past was of infinite duration, an infinity came to its end. But this is a self-contradiction."

I've always enjoyed time paradoxes. I think you're right on this one.

Follow Ups:

It does not matter what we say - yanniru - July 8, 2001 - 20:13 UTC
- Then explain it - stormcrow - July 8, 2001 - 23:20 UTC
  - It just happened - yanniru - July 9, 2001 - 13:14 UTC
    - Then I'm sorry - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 16:39 UTC
      - Highvoltage, there is NO logic in your words. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 18:03 UTC
        
        You are WRONG! - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 19:05 UTC
        
        Incorrect understanding of INFINITY. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 19:18 UTC
        
        Yes, finite time between events, that's it! - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 20:04 UTC
        
        So what? - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 20:28 UTC
        
        A finite point is not actually finite on an infinite timeline - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 22:26 UTC
        
        It just starts at a reference point - yanniru - July 9, 2001 - 23:37 UTC
        
        I see what your saying but there's a problem - highvoltage - July 10, 2001 - 16:40 UTC
        
        Time is reversible in math - yanniru - July 10, 2001 - 16:52 UTC
        
        This is not a logic, this is LACK of logic. - alexander - July 10, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
        
        Nope alex - highvoltage - July 11, 2001 - 04:37 UTC
        
        You rely too much on math - highvoltage - July 11, 2001 - 04:41 UTC
        
        Pointless - yanniru - July 11, 2001 - 12:05 UTC
        
        Mike, what is you math background? - alexander - July 11, 2001 - 16:22 UTC
        
        Part of post was missing. - alexander - July 11, 2001 - 18:16 UTC
        
        Part of post was missing. - alexander - July 11, 2001 - 18:18 UTC
        
        Quick question, Mike - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 19:20 UTC
        
        I'm not saying that - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 20:11 UTC
        
        OK= the proof - yanniru - July 9, 2001 - 23:39 UTC
        
        Not ill defined, but undefined. - alexander - July 10, 2001 - 17:15 UTC
- Yes please explain - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 05:18 UTC
  - No proof availabe - yanniru - July 9, 2001 - 13:18 UTC
    - Then someone else please explain - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 16:47 UTC
      - Highvoltage, there is NO logic in your words. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 18:11 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins