Then I'm Sorry - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Then I'm Sorry

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mike Banks on July 9, 2001 16:39:32 UTC

This logic doesn't make sense to you? It makes perfect sense to me.

"Science says that time can be infinite. If you think differently, then you had better reconsider how you do your thinking."

I say that time can't be infinite. If you think differently, then you had better reconsider how you do your thinking.

Really, how can this back up an argument? You say there is really no way to prove it, but you seem to know for a fact that it happened. Please show me how science says this. I gave some problems with infinite time, yet you just respond by saying "science says so, so it must be true."

Follow Ups:

Highvoltage, there is NO logic in your words. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 18:03 UTC
- You are WRONG! - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 19:05 UTC
  - Incorrect understanding of INFINITY. - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 19:18 UTC
    - Yes, finite time between events, that's it! - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 20:04 UTC
      - So what? - alexander - July 9, 2001 - 20:28 UTC
        
        A finite point is not actually finite on an infinite timeline - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 22:26 UTC
        
        It just starts at a reference point - yanniru - July 9, 2001 - 23:37 UTC
        
        I see what your saying but there's a problem - highvoltage - July 10, 2001 - 16:40 UTC
        
        Time is reversible in math - yanniru - July 10, 2001 - 16:52 UTC
        
        This is not a logic, this is LACK of logic. - alexander - July 10, 2001 - 17:11 UTC
        
        Nope alex - highvoltage - July 11, 2001 - 04:37 UTC
        
        You rely too much on math - highvoltage - July 11, 2001 - 04:41 UTC
        
        Pointless - yanniru - July 11, 2001 - 12:05 UTC
        
        Mike, what is you math background? - alexander - July 11, 2001 - 16:22 UTC
        
        Part of post was missing. - alexander - July 11, 2001 - 18:16 UTC
        
        Part of post was missing. - alexander - July 11, 2001 - 18:18 UTC
  - Quick question, Mike - stormcrow - July 9, 2001 - 19:20 UTC
    - I'm not saying that - highvoltage - July 9, 2001 - 20:11 UTC
      - OK= the proof - yanniru - July 9, 2001 - 23:39 UTC
        
        Not ill defined, but undefined. - alexander - July 10, 2001 - 17:15 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins