God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| "Universal" Time
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics Posted by Mike Banks on June 28, 2001 08:36:09 UTC |
For a moment let's assume there was a big bang. Since time is slowed down at higher velocity or gravity, then wouldn't the rate of time been very fast in the first billion years of the big bang as compared to our time on earth? Do scientists consider this when calculating the age of the universe after the big bang? If not, then I would think the universe to be less older, using earth time, than previously thought. Or would calculating the rate of expansion not affect this? |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |