Between The Cracks - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Between The Cracks

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on June 21, 2001 23:06:50 UTC

Aurino,

In all fairness to Dick, there is another possibility. Dick's formulations fall between two isolated fields (philosophy and science) and therefore his ideas are falling between the cracks and on deaf ears. Philosophers don't generally discuss mathematical models (in regards to understanding epistemology) and physicists don't generally discuss epistemology. So, there you have it, Dick is between the cracks. In my opinion, he would have better luck with philosophers - since at least the subject matter that views are concerned - epistemology and mind -are currently debated in the halls of philosophy.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

The magician and the rabbit - aurino - June 22, 2001 - 12:58 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins