No, ADAM and EVE (as an example ) is not a scientific truth. Are you ALIVE and AWAKE over
there? All of that mess you posted earlier was
in effect as if you didn't hear me earlier. The
bible is not out to prove the origins of man, even
though some priests and theologians would like to
think so. They'd like to think that there's an
alien presence scratching over his drawing board
just outside of our atmosphere, or haunting the
nearest diffuse nebula. This is necessary for people who are dependant. ( We've been through
religions role as a caretaker for millions of people so I'll skip that ) BUTTTTTTTTTT, the
bible again, in Jesus' intention ( if he ever knew it would exist ) would to be simply to carry on his teachings and those of the prophets before him. Very simple teachings, very kind, very common
sense. And again, they have NOTHING to do with
scientific deduction, or logic. Merely hundreds
of mixed doctored and unabridged information readily avail. for people's scruntiny.

• I don't think so - stormcrow - June 19, 2001 - 03:28 UTC
  • Here's why... - crowslayer - June 19, 2001 - 15:12 UTC
    • Agree and Disagree - stormcrow - June 19, 2001 - 20:47 UTC
      • I know they do, "BUT" - crowslayer - June 19, 2001 - 21:12 UTC
        • Not good enough - stormcrow - June 20, 2001 - 02:40 UTC
          • Right...Good Enough, sir - crowslayer - June 20, 2001 - 03:20 UTC
            • Okay - stormcrow - June 20, 2001 - 14:03 UTC
              • Omit your last word ;-) - crowslayer - June 21, 2001 - 03:59 UTC
                • So why do you believe then? - stormcrow - June 21, 2001 - 13:47 UTC
                  • Hey Guys! - doctordick - June 21, 2001 - 15:42 UTC
                    • Okily Dokily - stormcrow - June 21, 2001 - 18:13 UTC
                      • Also - stormcrow - June 21, 2001 - 18:22 UTC