Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Not Necessarily

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aurino Souza on May 1, 2001 17:54:36 UTC

What I really had in mind was something like this: given a certain amount of data, how many models exist which describe the data? I think it's fair to assume there are several. For instance, in terms of math, you can express the same equation in several different ways, none of them less right than the other. You can also come up with several approximations and all their different versions, which add up to a lot of ways of describing the same data.

In essence this is what our mind does, it takes a stream of data and proceeds to build equations that approximate it. Of course the more data the less equations you can have but still you can always have more than one. So I don't think it's really that simple to explain why we chose a particular equation. Survival doesn't explain much in my opinion as different equations could achieve the same goal, some of them even more efficiently. And to make it worse, the concept of survival itself is part of the equation, not necessarily of the data.

Now I think I really lost my ability to communicate :)

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins