Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Paul R. Martin on May 1, 2001 21:28:34 UTC

Hi Aurino,

Boy, we really do have to quibble over trifles to get to a disagreement.

>>>What I had in mind was something like, why do we translate reality in terms of light, sound, space, time, instead of doing it in terms of thilg, duson, pasec, meti, or any other set of concepts that would still allow us to survive, although instead of survival we would possibly have lavurvis?>This is not a joke, just a difficult idea to explain. I don't think survival explains the features of our model of reality as I believe there are several other models which would do the same thing, possibly even better. That is where I think I disagree with you.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins