Or more easy what I am not

1. Not a constructionist as I believe in math infinities, but not physical ones

2. Not an idealist as I do believe that material things are not the ultimate reality, but I also believe that our mental images are even further removed from reality

3. And it follows that I am not a phenomenonlist, although that is a new definition to me.

I think the remaining ...lists apply to me.

Feel free to label me with ...lists

• Would you like to debate infinity in math? - paulm - April 26, 2001 - 16:05 UTC
  • Interested - yanniru - April 26, 2001 - 18:33 UTC
    • Good, maybe we can both learn something, - paulm - April 27, 2001 - 17:01 UTC
      • Grainy geometry - yanniru - April 27, 2001 - 17:57 UTC
        • Plane out of point? No way. - alexander - April 27, 2001 - 21:25 UTC
          • Not a single point - yanniru - April 27, 2001 - 21:50 UTC
            • Nope, won't work. Matrix does not make a plane or a line. - alexander - April 27, 2001 - 22:10 UTC
              • You do not need to define line in descrete math - yanniru - April 27, 2001 - 22:57 UTC
                • We talking geometry - alexander - April 30, 2001 - 17:51 UTC
  • axiom of choice - mathman - April 27, 2001 - 04:04 UTC
    • Here's the connection I see - paulm - April 27, 2001 - 17:52 UTC
      • QM is one of example of discrete math. - alexander - April 27, 2001 - 21:33 UTC
        • I'm talking about finite; not discrete. (NT) - paulm - April 27, 2001 - 21:53 UTC
          • So, what is the diff: non-finite versus discrete? - alexander - April 27, 2001 - 22:13 UTC
            • Finite implies discrete; not the other way around. - paulm - April 28, 2001 - 00:42 UTC