Actually StandardBig Bang Is A Time Interval In Universe Evolut. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Actually StandardBig Bang Is A Time Interval In Universe Evolut.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on April 19, 2001 20:15:31 UTC

It is believed to be from 10^-31 sec to present day.

It is now believed to be preceeded by inflation (from Plank time to 10-31 sec), which in turn is resently proposed to start by some process in false vacuum triggered its transition to lower energy state.

So it seems that the more "back" we learn, the likely that it all evolves without actual beginning.

Follow Ups:

Do you believe in inflation? (nt) - harvey1 - April 19, 2001 - 20:48 UTC
- Yes, it is not a matter of belief but facts. - alexander - April 19, 2001 - 21:13 UTC
  - So, - harvey1 - April 19, 2001 - 21:22 UTC
    - No, string theory is not "other possibility" - alexander - April 19, 2001 - 22:43 UTC
      - Just look at the paper before making up your mind - harvey1 - April 20, 2001 - 15:28 UTC
        
        Harway, do you have any scientific background? - alexander - April 20, 2001 - 19:27 UTC
        
        Another point missed - harvey1 - April 20, 2001 - 19:38 UTC
        
        I don't think their qualification is more than mine, yours-maybe - alexander - April 20, 2001 - 20:50 UTC
        
        Interesting - harvey1 - April 20, 2001 - 21:02 UTC
        
        I met so many people in different conferences, institutes, etc. - alexander - April 20, 2001 - 21:47 UTC
        
        Sounds like you and Dick have much in common (nt) - harvey1 - April 20, 2001 - 21:53 UTC
        
        re: qualifications - harvey1 - April 20, 2001 - 21:33 UTC
        
        Back to the issue at hand - harvey1 - April 20, 2001 - 22:11 UTC
        
        I'd like to see some detals - bladesinger - April 23, 2001 - 13:48 UTC
        
        Whoops, I meant details! nt - bladesinger - April 23, 2001 - 13:51 UTC
        
        Already Linde and group have a rebuttal. - bruce - April 21, 2001 - 05:07 UTC
        
        Already Linde and group have a rebuttal. - bruce - April 21, 2001 - 05:07 UTC
        
        I don't think they will take this challenge sitting down - harvey1 - April 23, 2001 - 15:08 UTC
      - are you interested - newguy - August 28, 2001 - 00:27 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins