The fact that all natural laws come from symmetries is NOT my opinion - it is well known theorem of mathematics (correspondence between invariant physical quantities like energy, momentum, speed of light, etc to invariance (symmetries)). It is just re-calling things: symmetry of time by invariance of energy, etc.

It is just re-labeling of a bunch of one mathematical object (symmetry of shifts in time) as another mathematical object (energy).

Nothing to do with my personal beliefs or opinion.

(Actually my PERSONAL opinion is that it is impossible that everything in Universe is mathematically related - but who cares about my or any other alien's personal opinion anyway).

I just state MATHEMATICAL FACTS, that is it.

• Symmetry of shifts in time - yanniru - April 18, 2001 - 12:07 UTC
  • Completely agree. - alexander - April 18, 2001 - 13:51 UTC
    • Thanks - yanniru - April 18, 2001 - 14:51 UTC
  • Both of you completely miss the point! - doctordick - April 18, 2001 - 14:06 UTC
    • Dick, space, time, etc exist INDEPENDENT of humans. - alexander - April 18, 2001 - 14:39 UTC
      • Again and again - harvey1 - April 18, 2001 - 15:14 UTC
        • WOW! This is a cool superstition. - alexander - April 18, 2001 - 16:23 UTC
          • Alex - harvey1 - April 18, 2001 - 16:56 UTC
            • So, you claim that when you close eye, light disappears? - alexander - April 18, 2001 - 18:37 UTC
              • We can test that... - harvey1 - April 18, 2001 - 19:35 UTC
                • So, Sun did not shine. Harvey, what education do you have? - alexander - April 18, 2001 - 21:32 UTC
                  • Tsk.. tsk.. Alex - harvey1 - April 18, 2001 - 21:38 UTC
                    • No, I just want you to honestly answer - alexander - April 18, 2001 - 22:14 UTC
                      • First answer my question - harvey1 - April 18, 2001 - 22:20 UTC
                        • That is the point. - alexander - April 19, 2001 - 01:07 UTC
                          • No, that misses the point - harvey1 - April 19, 2001 - 14:02 UTC
                            • No, human experiments or observations are needed. - alexander - April 19, 2001 - 20:26 UTC
                              • Typo in the title. Humans NOT needed. See copy below. - alexander - April 19, 2001 - 20:28 UTC
                            • No, human experiments or observations are NOT needed. - alexander - April 19, 2001 - 20:27 UTC
                              • Alex, if you don't mind I moved this to the top (nt) - harvey1 - April 19, 2001 - 21:00 UTC
                          • And who checks the plants? - doctordick - April 19, 2001 - 17:38 UTC
                            • Unlike God (Ghostd) evolution, plants evolution is documented - alexander - April 19, 2001 - 20:22 UTC
    • Dick you're not alone - harvey1 - April 18, 2001 - 15:11 UTC
      • I don't think so! - doctordick - April 19, 2001 - 17:41 UTC