No, We Do Not Have To Have Stuff "on The Table" To Prove It. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

No, We Do Not Have To Have Stuff "on The Table" To Prove It.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on April 16, 2001 17:17:40 UTC

Because everything is related mathematically, we have just to see what are observable mathematical consequences of it and look out if we can find them.

Say, big bang resulted in CMBR (background radiation) which we can see and can test.

Follow Ups:

CMBR does not prove big bag happened - yanniru - April 16, 2001 - 23:52 UTC
- 3-K CBR convinced scientists of the Big Bang - johnpowell - April 17, 2001 - 16:15 UTC
  - More than two creation theories - yanniru - April 17, 2001 - 17:19 UTC
    - Theistic scientists hope science will support them - johnpowell - April 17, 2001 - 20:25 UTC
      - Science is more trustworthy - yanniru - April 18, 2001 - 12:34 UTC
        
        Do you believe in God because of fields? - johnpowell - April 19, 2001 - 20:15 UTC
        
        God is just a possibility - yanniru - April 19, 2001 - 23:33 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins