Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
3-K CBR Convinced Scientists Of The Big Bang

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by John Morgan Powell on April 17, 2001 16:15:50 UTC

300,000 years sounds like a big time span compared to human's and society's lifespans, but when the two competing scientific theories for Hubble's observed redshift expansion of the universe are

1. The universe is historical (had a history) with an origin billions of years ago.


2. The universe is eternal, steady state, with matter and space being continually created.

300,000 years is nothing. The discovery of the 3-K black-body cosmic background radiation by Penzias and Wilson convinced the scientific community that the first theory, some version of the Big Bang, was correct. Exactly how the Big Bang occurred (what happened prior to the production of the CBR, for example) had yet to be determined.

The fact that the CBR does not correspond to the first seconds or minutes of creation, but corresponds to something that happened 300,000 years after the Big Bang is noted, but does not invalidate the basic Big Bang idea or give theists any reason to hope that God can be found somewhere lurking in the creation of the universe.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins