Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Partly Right

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Brian E. Sloan on April 9, 2001 17:44:56 UTC

Science is incapable of providing a transcendant basis for moral or ethical judgement. Furthermore, it has been wrongfully used as a tool to deny the existence of any such code. Therefore, we are left with these seemingly insoluble dillemmas, such as what is life and where it begins.

To bring this back to my point, it is inevitable that society, deprived of a fixed basis for defining moral judgment, will turn to arbitrary fiat, to decide these sorts of issues.

So you are partly right, there is no black and white. This is why they indoctrinate public school children with what has become known as moral or ethical relativity. That is, there is no right or wrong [indeed, given the paradigm, how can there be] and that the moral judgment takes place within the context of the situation.

Though, this philosophy may "tickle the ears", it
is has led to the inability for one question the atrocities of a Hitler, for example. Who am I to say that is wrong to murder Jews? To do so, one must either play God, or invoke some transcendent moral code.

Which we all know doesn't exist.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins