Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Souls And Physics And Chemistry

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael Libbie on March 6, 2001 22:43:13 UTC

our two prevailing sciences(oops i should have included biology) have no way to prove (yet) that there are souls. i dont think all researchers are out to prove that souls do not exist. i think that many believe in them but would still like some tangible proof and are therefore actively trying to prove scientifically that they do exist. but i feel that untill there is proof that the jury is out on this subject. a person who feels that they are a product of reincarnation is just as hard to swollow by the scientific mind as the idea of god and resurrection.
so do souls not fit into these sciences? do they not have mass? do they not have chemistry? do they not have physical properties? are they complety undetectible like "dark matter"? first of all proof that souls exist would be a good start in believing whether or not there is reincarnation.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins