Chroot Sums It Up Nicely.. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Chroot Sums It Up Nicely..

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bruce on December 31, 2003 07:54:37 UTC

You certainly are no judge of who is a competant physicist Martin. If you let Dick judge competancy for reviewing his work [ugh] it will never take place. If Dick really understood physics he wouldn't bother with 'pure malarkey'.

Follow Ups:

Yes, he seems to be a good representative of Science - pmartin - December 31, 2003 - 17:20 UTC
- Dick doesn't understand the basic ... - bruce - December 31, 2003 - 21:39 UTC
  - You presume to know what Dick understands - pmartin - January 4, 2004 - 23:45 UTC
    - The purpose of a physical theory.. - bruce - January 8, 2004 - 20:46 UTC
      - Attacks without support! - doctordick - January 27, 2004 - 01:50 UTC
        
        Actually you initially... - bruce - February 1, 2004 - 07:58 UTC
- Dick could always talk to me - dolphin - January 1, 2004 - 06:03 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins