Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Dick Doesn't Understand The Basic ...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Bruce on December 31, 2003 21:39:20 UTC

purpose of a physical theory. Harvey explained this, I've explained this, folks at sci.physics have explained this, and Chroot explained this. Dick said his theory was a bridge between QM and GR. Total BS [even a knowledgeable amateur will conclude]. So how would you conclude the comments made about Dick's work are not competant? Apparently you want folks to wade through his derivation [that which Dick thinks nobody is smart enough to understand] when the premise is totally bogus? Never happen.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins