Mike's posts are easy to be ignored, but when the forum comes to a point when Mike is the only one talking, that means it's time to take a break.

I noticed this forum goes in cycles. At one point people start having intelligent discussions, then more and more people join and older posters come back. Then Mike starts playing his game, and in a matter of a few days the whole forum is about nothing but Mike. That sends most people away, the forum becomes quiet for a while, and Mike is left with no one to harass. Then people are drawn back and the cycle starts all over again.

I've found a much better site on the net. It covers physics, mathematics, philosophy, religion, and pretty much everything we ever discussed here. It's got a lot more members and there are no idiots spoiling the fun. Unfortunately I can't post the address because I don't want Mike to be there, but you can e-mail me at aurinosouza@estadao.com.br if you're interested. I'd be great to see everyone else there.

Good luck to all

Aurino

• We all enjoy your posts, Aurino - kantolfir2 - December 4, 2003 - 18:02 UTC
• Aurino's secret government is evil - carefuluniverse - December 4, 2003 - 19:35 UTC
  • Does the W. stand for Whittier - secretary - December 4, 2003 - 20:10 UTC
    • Why do you only ask me? Am I the only one... - carefuluniverse - December 5, 2003 - 18:59 UTC
      • I'm new to the forum - secretary - December 5, 2003 - 19:35 UTC
        • This comment smells like yutuist my words - kantolfir2 - December 6, 2003 - 04:25 UTC
          • Racism according to Michael W. Pearson - secretary - December 6, 2003 - 16:20 UTC
            • Rawson rejects the proposition - quiet - December 7, 2003 - 07:16 UTC
              • Pearson is anti-Quaker - secretary - December 7, 2003 - 14:19 UTC
                • I am not anti-Quaker - quiet - December 7, 2003 - 16:17 UTC
            • Designed racism is a lower level of rationality - carefuluniverse - December 7, 2003 - 18:53 UTC
              • Are you capable of a discussion? - secretary - December 7, 2003 - 20:22 UTC
                • Characterize this? - whomi - December 8, 2003 - 07:18 UTC
                  • My god, is this still another Pearson - secretary - December 8, 2003 - 12:30 UTC
                    • Rawson the atheist attacks the Pearson name - kantolfir2 - December 8, 2003 - 17:25 UTC