Planck's constant and c are not limits of scientifically meaningful discussions of time;
granular resolution is. I'm sure Rutuist would say that's gibberish. But it is quite arrogant
to assert that what you do not understand
in any way defines what is understandable.
Thanks, Clerk. You are a chief.

• What do you mean - secretary - December 3, 2003 - 14:33 UTC
  • It's my middle name and there's a family connection - kantolfir2 - December 3, 2003 - 22:02 UTC
    • So.... You're a Poet Bard and things and stuff? - kantolfir2 - December 4, 2003 - 04:10 UTC
      • I do not get it - secretary - December 4, 2003 - 12:47 UTC
        • So you're a Quaker? That is interesting. - kantolfir2 - December 4, 2003 - 18:05 UTC
          • You avoided the question again - secretary - December 4, 2003 - 19:57 UTC
            • I do realize Whittier is not the home town of JG Whittier - carefuluniverse - December 5, 2003 - 18:59 UTC
              • It also happens to be my middle name - kantolfir2 - December 5, 2003 - 19:08 UTC
                • Here is what you said - secretary - December 5, 2003 - 19:49 UTC
                  • You have no training in science? - quiet - December 6, 2003 - 10:43 UTC
                    • You again avoided the question - secretary - December 6, 2003 - 16:28 UTC
                      • Quit posing as a Quaker, you liar. - quiet - December 7, 2003 - 07:17 UTC
                        • God knows who I am and what I am - secretary - December 7, 2003 - 14:22 UTC
                          • Same here - quiet - December 7, 2003 - 16:25 UTC
                          • Although I do not actually speak for God in that - quiet - December 7, 2003 - 16:25 UTC
                    • Can't you keep track of who you are?? - secretary - December 6, 2003 - 16:35 UTC
                      • You cannot and and you do not understand science - quiet - December 7, 2003 - 07:19 UTC
                        • Quakers are ignorant, disrespectful liars - secretary - December 7, 2003 - 14:28 UTC
                          • No they are not, although Rawson said so - quiet - December 7, 2003 - 16:58 UTC
                            • Here is where you said it - secretary - December 7, 2003 - 20:54 UTC
                              • You have the same distortion pattern as Yutuist - whomi - December 8, 2003 - 06:54 UTC
                                • Who is yutuist - secretary - December 8, 2003 - 12:52 UTC