> Another explanation of EPR is string theory where particles can only be created in ten dimensions. So when a particle pair is produced at one point, and the particle and the anti-particle fly off in opposite directions, but they remain connected in the six compactified dimensions.

As much as I know the string theory is far from complete yet and there are many problems. BEC can also be explained without any quantum consciousness.

> But considering that consciousness can be non-local, which BTW is not proven scientifically,the medium must be a non-local medium

It may need a system with many connections (up to 12000) from a node like it is reflected by neurons in the brain, and in quantum medium it's likely impossible to implement such system without nonlocal connections, but this is of course not proven scientifically until we prove scientifically that there is quantum consciousness.

> and undetectable as well, like the thread.

Why?

> But since 3-d extent is necessary for thinking, a BEC is more appropriate.

If there are no nonlocal connections, then it most likely must be 3d because 3 is a minimal number of dimensions where we can implement any system (this is why cards in the computer have several layers).

> A bec has other useful properties like being frictionless. So it apply to the supernatural.

He's tellin' me more and more about some useless information supposed to fire my imagination (Rolling Stones)

> And since it must have location and be undetectable,

Why?

> it seems to be like Dark Matter. So I just suggested a model of Dark Matter.

So the only evidence of quantum consciousness for you is non-locality. Seems by far not enough.

• A new theory and answers to your questions - yanniru - November 26, 2003 - 19:12 UTC
  • You offer me Neural Networks again, thank you but no - tkorrovi - November 26, 2003 - 20:21 UTC
    • We have our differences - yanniru - November 27, 2003 - 13:51 UTC
      • Yes we have differences - tkorrovi - November 27, 2003 - 16:10 UTC
        • Please elaborate - yanniru - November 27, 2003 - 23:25 UTC
          • What I wanted to say - tkorrovi - November 28, 2003 - 00:37 UTC
            • I just wanted your opinion - yanniru - November 28, 2003 - 15:52 UTC
              • Thank you - tkorrovi - November 29, 2003 - 15:25 UTC
  • or did you mean this - tkorrovi - December 4, 2003 - 02:40 UTC