Don't you see that the paper you presented is neural network approach. There is plenty of such in the Internet, but you see neural network is not more than image recognition system what consists of two dimensional array of "neurons" what fire when pulses come from certain range (this is how it recognises images). It comes from the age of logical elements when they couldn't imagine anything else to model neurons, but they are not the only image recognition systems, to mystify them and even call them "consciousness" is the most unscientific thing what ever can be.

I take that your "BEC consciousness" means quantum consciousness in BEC, but you didn't explain what it is.

If you read then I never said that quantum consciousness must not be nonlocal, just if it is nonlocal then space may well be 2d, because nonlocality is not a part of the cartesian space.

• We have our differences - yanniru - November 27, 2003 - 13:51 UTC
  • Yes we have differences - tkorrovi - November 27, 2003 - 16:10 UTC
    • Please elaborate - yanniru - November 27, 2003 - 23:25 UTC
      • What I wanted to say - tkorrovi - November 28, 2003 - 00:37 UTC
        • I just wanted your opinion - yanniru - November 28, 2003 - 15:52 UTC
          • Thank you - tkorrovi - November 29, 2003 - 15:25 UTC