I had not meant to represent myself as a final
authority on all questions without further discussion. I had made some observations which
are pretty accepted in scholarly circles. Certainly there is wiggle room and possibility for debate.
But, Aaron, just out of high school, how can you
simply dictate an interpretation of history
that is not consistent in terms of definitions
and contains practically carefully assembled examples and logic?

I suspect what you said is merely the rhetoric
of bluster, not a well-reasoned thought based on
a deep reading of the matter.

• that should have read "practically no " - quiet - October 18, 2003 - 01:53 UTC
• Simple. - emperor_alikar - October 18, 2003 - 03:12 UTC
  • Not so simple - stormcrow - October 19, 2003 - 04:13 UTC
    • Wow, Well said, Mario And.... - sillyuniverse - October 19, 2003 - 15:48 UTC
    • not really not so simple - emperor_alikar - October 20, 2003 - 05:30 UTC
      • Politics and religion go hand-in-hand - stormcrow - October 20, 2003 - 23:05 UTC
        • Your own definitions of politically or religiously liberal ? - quiet - October 22, 2003 - 19:17 UTC
          • Maybe.... - stormcrow - October 23, 2003 - 00:39 UTC
            • actually the nazis were liberal - emperor_alikar - October 23, 2003 - 01:34 UTC
              • I consider that a personal attack on America's Founding Fathers - carefuluniverse - October 23, 2003 - 03:56 UTC
              • Explain. - stormcrow - October 23, 2003 - 17:57 UTC
                • True - carefuluniverse - October 24, 2003 - 04:09 UTC