Hi Bruce,

"You said it yourself: "any set of numbers must obey his equation". That means "most of physics" applies not only to reality, but also to an infinite collection of 9's. It also applies to "a whole lot of nothing"."

You got that first part right, since an infinite collection of 9's is a set of numbers. But you got the last part wrong because "a whole lot of nothing" is not a set of numbers. You should have known that, Bruce. For shame.

It's been good talking with you, Bruce. I have been wondering if you would ever carry on a conversation with me. Thanks. I appreciate it.

Warm regards,

Paul

• Paul - harvey1 - September 24, 2003 - 21:23 UTC
  • Harv - pmartin - September 25, 2003 - 00:41 UTC
    • Harv, I think Paul means it! - carefuluniverse - September 25, 2003 - 01:37 UTC
    • more blah-blah-blah - tourist - September 25, 2003 - 13:20 UTC
      • Jibber-Jabber is a "Harv" word - carefuluniverse - September 25, 2003 - 16:41 UTC
        • Hmmm. Good Points (nt) - pmartin - September 25, 2003 - 17:32 UTC
  • You are right Harv... - bruce - September 26, 2003 - 08:55 UTC
    • I think - harvey1 - September 26, 2003 - 14:26 UTC
      • That is pretty obvious to me... - bruce - September 26, 2003 - 21:39 UTC
• You suck as a detective martin... - bruce - September 26, 2003 - 08:47 UTC
  • True - pmartin - September 26, 2003 - 16:15 UTC
• Bruce implies being correct is a good reason to be a roadapple - carefuluniverse - September 26, 2003 - 18:27 UTC
  • Bruce may be rude but he has an advantage - aurino_ - September 26, 2003 - 18:53 UTC
    • dnftt - carefuluniverse - September 27, 2003 - 03:51 UTC
      • What the heck does that mean - secretary - December 3, 2003 - 18:53 UTC
    • dnftt - carefuluniverse - September 27, 2003 - 03:51 UTC