Sorry - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Sorry

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard D. Stafford, Ph.D. on September 18, 2003 12:59:31 UTC

All I have stated here is the theorem, once understood, the theorem is quite easy to prove. I think your problem is that you don't even understand the theorem.

A proof lies in the discussion between equations 1.20 and 1.25. The problem is you just don't understand it. Go read it carefully, line by line.

Follow Ups:

Gotcha - yanniru - September 18, 2003 - 14:39 UTC
- All I am is sorry! - doctordick - September 19, 2003 - 00:32 UTC
  - Nice smoke screen - yanniru - September 19, 2003 - 00:53 UTC
    - Physicists "know" a lot of things! - doctordick - September 19, 2003 - 02:22 UTC
      - You are then ignorant of your own kind of physics-nt - yanniru - September 21, 2003 - 01:13 UTC
        
        It's simple egotism - harvey1 - September 22, 2003 - 00:56 UTC
  - Humean cause and effect - harvey1 - September 22, 2003 - 15:11 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins