Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Nice Smoke Screen

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on September 19, 2003 00:53:46 UTC

You said:

"What those symmetries say is that the entire universe taken as a holistic entity in its entirety must obey those symmetries."

Physicists know that this statement is incorrect.

At the most fundamental level, the Planck level, there is no symmetry. There is no space time.

It is only that the equations you derive from F=0 must obey these symmetries, in accordance with your own theorem. The rules are the symmetries, not F=0. You do not seem to understand your own work.

BTW- There has been real progress in finding a TOE on the basis of loop quantum gravity. I refer you to Martin Bojowald's papers. The most recent as of yesterday is given as a reference in the Big Bang forum and again down below in answer to a query by Harv.

Who are the two guys, you and Frieden? I gave reference to your work to Frieden but he claims there is no overlap as his is based on Fisher's sampling theorem. Yet there certainly is an overlap is what the two of you are claiming.

How come you have never mentioned Frieden's papers????

Around and around we go, having fun?


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins