Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Reply To Me?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on August 5, 2003 14:54:56 UTC


I gather that half of your response was to me?

Regarding the origin of ideas that are published in science. My experience teaches me that ideas largely come from the very few genius type scientists. I am not one.

The grunts in the field do the majority of good science. It's just that the Einstein among us is in the best situation to take advantage of it by capsulizing on all those discoveries into one significant and beautiful theory. I personally think it has more to do with creative thinking than so much as being a 'genius type'. Stephen King should have gone into physics, he probably would have been a good one. That's not to say that physics is like writing fiction...

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins