|
There seems little reason to
answer you on the terms you pose.
1) You don't really contribute much science to
the forum; if I am mistaken, please identify
five or ten science posts.
2) you are still a larva in the religion department (a product of school and parents, not depth of life experience outside your parents' home or knowledge gained from working in industry, world travel, or advanced study)
3) your argumentive psychological musings
would certainly get you attention on a bus, but
most of it, purportedly about me, wasn't pertinent to me. I wonder if you expect others to be nice to you even if you are not nice to them. Yet I don't try to be anything but cordial even though I am forthright in pointing out your errors. I am very affectionate toward human beings; I have to be patient with them; and if you are actually as intelligent as you say, you will also have to be. I have doubts about your claims of brilliance, since you should have experienced by now the frightening experience of being alone at the top.
4) I don't think you respond to much of any of
the science posts here.
5) I don't see indications that you have read much of the forum, which goes back several years, yet you propose to have all these opinions
of the posters.
|
