Harv; think please!!!!!!!

Are you overly in awe of "experts" and "people who you think are important"?

You can do better than this Harv!?

Harv; please THINK! Please do not be so quick to pass something off as "rubbish" without even seriously looking at what it is saying.

That nursery ryhme maps spectacularly well what goes on.

You seem to have a rule in your head that says "that Harv, or me, or Dr. Richard Stafford, etc." can not be ten million times smarter than Einstein?

Fair enough: I don't claim to be ten million times smarter than Einstein.
Counting. numbers: my point is "the end of this business of compulsory numbers; of forcing people into boxes".

You, I , Einstein; can all meet freely in a zone beyond mathematical attack; where each is free to be smarter, dumber, whatever.

I have not given technical details of a way of mapping physics, mathematics, and the relationship between them. I suggest you hold judgement in the meantime.

David Oakley's post indicates he is very very intelligent.

I can make mistakes; I do not claim no errors will be found in my physics mapping system.

Regards,

Alan

• I feel for you Alan - harvey1 - June 21, 2003 - 04:31 UTC
  • These putdowns are not necessary - carefuluniverse - June 21, 2003 - 16:07 UTC
    • I have no reason to even think of hiding you - harvey1 - June 21, 2003 - 17:19 UTC